Introduction

Before proceeding, we must stand up and make a very simple question: if our young people were initiated into the universe through a similar cosmology, a cosmology that sees the universe as sacred, a cosmology that shows the great human and cosmic role a cosmology that loves animals and other forms of life, what would our children doomed to grow and destroy the Earth, as many of us have done? 
If we were to establish a culture rooted in a living cosmology, we should know why views like those of Clow, would inevitably be dismissed by the "Global Management Team."

Copernicus

Humanity lost speculative cosmology five centuries ago when the new scientific enterprises destroyed the common understanding of the universe of medieval humanity. In 1543, Nicolaus Copernicus, an obscure Polish astronomer, said the Sun, not Earth, was the center of the world.

Of course we accept this now as some, but remember that whole culture was based on the assumption that the Earth was the center. One result of this transformation was to discard all speculative cosmological work, similar work that you have in your hands, threw them all away. Let me explain how it happened.

Copernicus, more than anyone, knew how dangerous it was his research. As canon of the Church, refused to publish his findings until he was on his deathbed.What he feared finally happening: the scientific content of his research was accepted and cosmological orientation of the medieval world was slowly but decisively rejected. The modern world, based on the division between science and religion, was born at that time. Since then the religion would be considered as a repository of truths about the conduct required to reach the sky, science, moreover, is increasingly understood as a method of discovering the truth of the physical universe, a world devoid of spiritual realities and contain only raw material.

What we see here is that Copernicus' discovery of the truth concerning the motion of the Earth around the Sun, also made ​​humans will fight about how truth is integrated. For many hundreds of thousands of years, humans maintained that the Earth was the center of the universe. Those humans have been deeply puzzled by the suggestion that the Sun lay in the center and that the Earth revolved around it. 
To the mind naive or pre-Copernican, sun is hot this thing up there in the sky and travels every day around the Earth. We can not define its size but should not be too large as it can impede your vision with a thumb. The Earth however, is the whole world! It's the major oceans and tides and huge mountain ranges and terrible hurricanes! From snowstorms and avalanches!

Copernicus's greatness lies in his book that caused a process by which most advanced thinkers of Europe could envision this new, subtle and surprising truth: The Sun is at the center of the solar system as Earth, Mars, Jupiter and all other planets revolve around it. However, the unfortunate part was that convinced us that our feelings and intuitions unreliable. Thereafter, all the work that took into account these ways of knowing, and certainly these are the primary ways in Clow's Pleiadian Cosmology, should be considered meaningless, stupid, worthless and a waste of time. 
How, then, should one approach the visionary works and speculative, especially when you have in your hands?

Think there are three basic approaches: the first would be modern and mainstream science, which considers any discussion based on astrology or tuning galactic as useless. This approach is characteristic of most scientists today.

The second approach is to consider such work as something that is literally and scientifically true, similar to how some people consider the Bible as being literally and scientifically true. This approach, perhaps even more popular than the first, has the unfortunate flaw of his followers face science approach is more powerful, more consensus in our culture to the truth.

The third approach, suggested by the text itself, is to think that this work belongs to the realm of poetry. To understand how a poetic vision may be true, but definitely in a different way of scientific certainty, I would like to offer the following two explanations and images of Pleiadian Cosmology as a whole: Imagine the moment when Beethoven first played his " Ode to Joy "in an empty room. But the room was not empty when we consider all forms of life, particularly single-celled prokaryotes were, imaginémoslo, floating in the air. Undoubtedly, if we suppose a single-celled organism most sensitive, the above minimum prokaryotes were unable to appreciate the music that was filling the room. What would have happened if a single, one billion of these creatures, one would have been a genius? What would have happened if instead of simply allowing the musical vibrations flit through it without noticing anything, this creature had awakened to the presence of something big?

It is certain that it would experience would be miserable only the most trifling of the global reality of the music of Beethoven, but it is inconceivable that had been shaken by a strange feeling that a magnificence far beyond their usual daily activities would have impregnated suddenly?

If a human has the sensitivity to respond to an intelligence that passes quickly through the Milky Way Galaxy, an intelligence that has organized three hundred billion stars for ten billion years, an intelligence whose form and manner of work is beyond any This is even articulated by careful and empirical techniques of modern astronomy, one can imagine that this man would have created a crazy, poetic fantasy. When the neocortex, or any other region of the central nervous system, is powered by a giant cyber or galactic mind, one can expect to hear the crazy and speculative visions of Barbara Hand Clow's Pleiadian Cosmology, but not the wise and safe claims of a really outdated.